Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 11:37:52AM -0400, Doug Knight wrote:
>> I'm getting the following warnings in the log, is it something I should
>> investigate or is it not to worry? I've seen 14 in the last 18 hours, on
>> a pair of fairly lightly loaded development servers, with no pattern of
>> when they occur. They were mostly overnight as well, when no one was
>> using them (three of the warnings did not have the third line below,
>> indicating "took too long to execute"):
>>
>> lrmd[4809]: 2007/04/27_01:34:20 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function
>> for SIGCHLD was delayed 1000 ms (> 100 ms) before being called (GSource:
>> 0x615098)
>> lrmd[4809]: 2007/04/27_01:34:20 info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at
>> 512110842 should have started at 512110742
>> lrmd[4809]: 2007/04/27_01:34:20 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function
>> for SIGCHLD took too long to execute: 60 ms (> 10 ms) (GSource:
>> 0x615098)
>
> Most of the time there's nothing to worry about. The latter
> example notes a 60ms vs. 10ms. Perhaps you have a backup running.
> The former one is a bit different, looks like there was a delay
> involved, nothing to do with the machine's load. Alan said
> something about removing or rewording these warnings. It'd be nice
> if we could also tie them to the actual operation which has been
> delayed.
I raised the threshold in the current Hg version. This is handling of
SIGCHLD that was delayed, and which seemed to take a long time to
execute. The 10ms was just too short.
--
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me
claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William
Wilberforce
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
