Kay,

Sorry I couldn't answer this earlier...

When I run the pe input file on my system here (2.0.7-1.2), the ptest utility 
moves all resources to the second node,
as expected. None are left on the first, AFAICS. See output attached. So either 
your version of HB comes to a different
conclusion -> a bug, or something else is going on...

To me, the issue where you have a group where "collocation=true" and resources 
don't move together looks like a bug. If
you can reproduce this, I think you should open a bugzilla for it, and see 
where it goes.

Something else: I'm not sure how well things will work with a group where 
"ordered=false", but with ordering
constraints attached to the resources within. I'm not sure this will work, as 
it could be valid for the pengine to give
precedence to the group's "ordered=false" setting, and ignore completely the 
manual ordering constraints.

Maybe somebody with better understanding can answer this one?

Where is the 2.0.8 version you have coming from? What platform? I'm starting to 
wonder if the 2.0.8 you're using is
"sane"...

To avoid the issue above where you create a group without ordering, but need 
some ordering nevertheless, maybe you
should try a config getting rid of the group, and doing the co-location 
manually. Bit of a pain to write, but IMHO worth
a try.

Yan

>>> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:09 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kai Bjørnstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> Hum, maybe you wanted the pe-input file instead
> (at time of lsb_conserver failure)
> 
> Kai
> -- 
> Kai R. Bjrnstad
> Senior Software Engineer
> dir. +47 22 62 89 43
> mob. +47 99 57 79 11
> tel. +47 22 62 89 50
> fax. +47 22 62 89 51
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Olaf Helsets vei 6
> N0621 Oslo, Norway
> 
> Scali - www.scali.com
> Scaling the Linux Datacenter

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to