Too bad it couldn't be named using some sort of an alpha designation. Matt
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 10:47 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On 5/10/07, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is no 2.0.9. Suse put out something they call 2.0.9. > > In fairness to SUSE, it was solely my doing while I learnt how to use > the openSUSE build service. The version there isnt an official SUSE > release either. > > To be honest I didnt know what to call it... 2.0.8 seemed wrong (since > there was an extra 4-5 months development in there) but there is no > real 2.0.9 either... oh well. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
