On 5/16/07, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/16/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/15/07, Serge Dubrouski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Andrew, you used to periodically update the stable Mercury repositary
> > but it looks like you aren;t doing this anymore. Why?
>
> I assume you mean:
> http://hg.linux-ha.org/heartbeat
I meant http://hg.beekhof.net/lha/crm-stable. In the past it used to
be updated regularly, though I don't know what was the main criteria
to update that branch.
ah that one.
not sure why I stopped updating that... but if people are indeed
finding it useful then i'm happy to start it up again.
>
> Its not been updated because there has been no release to update it from.
>
> > Putting HB built
> > from development version into production isn't an appropriate
> > solution,
>
> What is a released version if not a development version thats passed
> some testing hurdle?
And testing is a key thing for production environment. You won't argue
that it's not a good practice to put code submitted yesterday into
production today, will you?
Right, I'd not try to argue that.
What I was trying to say was that the version I made mention of
http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/SLE10-SP1.tar.bz2
got that testing.
> The problem here, is that the version in
> question was certified by SUSE for SLES users and there was no
> corresponding official community release.
>
> What is available though, is binaries for fedora, debian as well as a
> number of older SUSE platforms built from the same source at:
> http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/ha-clustering/
>
> I've also been campaigning for the ability to build for other
> archs+distro combinations, but this is a work in progress.
>
>
> > using 2.0.8 as you siad isn;t a good way too and there is no
> > current stable build anymore.
>
> go back and look at the first line of my initial response.
> its not a situation i'm particularly happy about either but we hope to
> have the situation rectified "soon".
>
> >
> > On 5/15/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 5/15/07, Benjamin Watine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I'm about to install Heartbeat on a fresh Debian 4 system, and I was
> > > > wondering wich version of heartbeat I should install ?
> > > > Some bugs have been corrected since v2.0.8, and I would like to install
> > > > these corrections too. So should I install v2.0.8 and apply the patches
> > > > that I want, or install the latest development version ?
> > > >
> > > > If you think there's no major problem installing latest snapshot, where
> > > > can I find it ? here ? : http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/tip.tar.bz2
> > > > Any other version to suggest ?
> > >
> > > A question with a rather unsatisfactory answer I'm afraid.
> > >
> > > I wouldn't recommend 2.0.8 - both due to its age and some rather
> > > unpleasant bugs and memory leaks it contained.
> > >
> > > But I also wouldn't recommend the latest snapshot either as the lrmd
> > > is in a rather sorry state.
> > >
> > > The link posted by Sam is probably the best bet for pre-built
> > > packages. Otherwise, if one is comfortable with building from
> > > scratch, I would use:
> > >
> > > http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/archive/SLE10-SP1.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > which is what will be going into SLES10, SP1 and was the subject of a
> > > respectable amount of testing.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > >
> > > > Benjamin
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
