On 5/25/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:13:07AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 04:43:49PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Hi Everyone,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to add monitor operations for some resources I've configured
> >in
> >> the cib.xml, but when I try to do it using the GUI, I'm getting some
> >> errors:
> >>
> >> mgmtd[7444]: 2007/05/22_15:14:02 info: xml:<group
> >> id="group_db2pr1"><primitive id="resource_db2_prod"><instance_attributes
> >> id="resource_db2_prod_instance_attrs"><attributes><nvpair
> >> id="resource_db2_prod_target_role" name="target_role"
> >> value="started"/></attributes></instance_attributes></primitive></group>
> >> cib[7439]: 2007/05/22_15:14:02 info: cib_diff_notify:notify.c Update
> >> (client: 7444, call:78): 0.50.2102 -> 0.50.2103 (ok)
> >> tengine[7566]: 2007/05/22_15:14:02 info: te_update_diff:callbacks.c
> >> Processing diff (cib_update): 0.50.2102 -> 0.50.2103
> >> cib[11932]: 2007/05/22_15:14:03 info: write_cib_contents:io.c Wrote
> >> version 0.50.2103 of the CIB to disk (digest:
> >> 789c15bbc0135d47631abb9f7cc0e4f6)
> >> mgmtd[7444]: 2007/05/22_15:14:03 info: xml:<group
> >> id="group_db2pr1"><primitive id="resource_db2_prod"><instance_attributes
> >> id="resource_db2_prod_instance_attrs"><attributes><nvpair
> >> id="94c70633-51d4-4cd8-90d2-4e691be4f44f" name="instance"
> >> value="db2admin"/></attributes></instance_attributes></primitive></group>
> >> cib[7439]: 2007/05/22_15:14:03 info: cib_diff_notify:notify.c Update
> >> (client: 7444, call:80): 0.50.2103 -> 0.50.2104 (ok)
> >> tengine[7566]: 2007/05/22_15:14:03 info: te_update_diff:callbacks.c
> >> Processing diff (cib_update): 0.50.2103 -> 0.50.2104
> >> cib[11933]: 2007/05/22_15:14:03 info: write_cib_contents:io.c Wrote
> >> version 0.50.2104 of the CIB to disk (digest:
> >> 374a5221c4e4f35156c5b8035a553971)
> >> cib[7439]: 2007/05/22_15:14:03 ERROR: Element primitive content does not
> >> follow the DTD, expecting (operations? , meta_attributes* ,
> >> instance_attributes*), got (instance_attributes operations )
> >
> >Old story, I'm afraid. The CIB is actually OK, because the order
> >doesn't matter, but it doesn't verify against the DTD. I guess
> >that the only solution is for the cib to ignore this particular
> >error. No idea if that's possible. Andrew?
>
> xml is order-sensitive and in some cases we just have to deal with
> that - because in order to tell the DTD not to care, you end up
> loosing any benefit of doing the DTD validation.
>
> unfortunately the people that wrote the GUI didn't take much notice of
> the interfaces of the thing it was supposed to configure and you end
> up with these sorts of problems.
Can the GUI enforce order of sections when creating XML?
not the way its currently designed
Not sure,
but I think I've seen this before and I never get close to the GUI.
> fyi: dtd validation _can_ be turned off by setting
> <cib ignore_dtd="false" ...>
> in your configuration.
>
> BUT BE VERY CAREFUL!
> There are good reasons we turn it on by default :-)
Indeed.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
--
Dejan
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
