Hi Max, Thunk you for your DTD and useful advice. I think your DTD perfectly matches the latest OCF RAs.
There still remains a problem about how to make it official, but it may not be a matter of this mailing list. I intend to find a ohter proper way. I have another question about how the DTD should be, so I will make a thread for it. See you later. > I had the same problem when i started out my HA cluster. > > I gave up to search an "offcial OCF" DTD. I think document > upgrade on the OCF hompage is pretty dead. > > Attached a DTD i found somewhere (forgot from where) made. > > A good starting mount is just to grep trough the RA provided by > heartbeat itself. > > It is the OCF DTD with follogin changes: > + additional tags for "longdesc", "shortdesc" > + "parameter" tag has an additional attribute "required" > + "action" attribute "name": use "monitor"/"validate-all instead > of "status"/" > > See the attachment (i habe no clue why i have an attribute > "expert level" i the attribute). > > An other question arises to me. Can anyone tell me if the "meta-data" > option is used by heartbeat (except for the graphical user interface)? > > kind regards > Max -- Takenaka Kazuhiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
