When Lars mentioned logging a bug, he probably meant in our Bugzilla so it can be tracked properly.
http://old.linux-foundation.org/developer_bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi On 7/2/07, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi A log and an configuration file were appended. The output error log becomes the following. ---------------------------------------- heartbeat[3002]: 2007/07/03_11:28:13 ERROR: process_status_message: bad node [192.168.40.1] in message heartbeat[3002]: 2007/07/03_11:28:13 ERROR: MSG: Dumping message with 6 fields heartbeat[3002]: 2007/07/03_11:28:13 ERROR: MSG[0] : [t=NS_st] heartbeat[3002]: 2007/07/03_11:28:13 ERROR: MSG[1] : [st=ping] heartbeat[3002]: 2007/07/03_11:28:13 ERROR: MSG[2] : [info=ping] heartbeat[3002]: 2007/07/03_11:28:13 ERROR: MSG[3] : [src=192.168.40.1] heartbeat[3002]: 2007/07/03_11:28:13 ERROR: MSG[4] : [ts=4689b43b] heartbeat[3002]: 2007/07/03_11:28:13 ERROR: MSG[5] : [auth=2 7fc72b41da381e8a388d289eeaec25c4] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- When starting, it becomes an error when it sets more than 100 nodes. I think that I should similarly become a start error in this case. Moreover, the development version(Heartbeat-Dev-94d9a8c98f92.tar.gz) was the same result though confirmed. The registration of bugzilla becomes tomorrow. Regard, Yamauchi > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of YAMAUCHI HIDEO > Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 9:20 AM > To: General Linux-HA mailing list > Subject: RE: [Linux-HA] Problem of check on number of nodes > > > Sorry.... > > I wanted to confirm it concerning the number of nodes that was able to be > treated. > When confirming it, this problem was found by chance. > > Regard, > Yamauchi. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lars > > Marowsky-Bree > > Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 3:15 AM > > To: General Linux-HA mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Problem of check on number of nodes > > > > > > On 2007-06-30T06:14:35, YAMAUCHI HIDEO > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I confirmed the maximum checks of the number of nodes. > > > It is not thought that it uses it by never 100 nodes. > > > > I apologize, but I do not understand what you wrote. > > > > Do you mean to say that you wanted to test the maximum node size, but > > that you never intend to run 100 nodes in practice? > > > > If so, what node count are you interested in? > > > > > > Regards, > > Lars > > > > -- > > Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development > > SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) > > "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- > Oscar Wilde > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
