On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 04:02:01AM -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote: > 2007/8/8, Lars Daniel Forseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > well, I recommend sticking to the OCF in any case and as far as I > > understood Andrew's previous mails re recommends it too. > > > > Using the lsb script should work though... > > > > Already have other resource running on a lsb script (nagios) and works fine
These are the reasons why you'd want to go with the resource agents distributed with Heartbeat (in particular the OCF class): - designed to work with Heartbeat - better support - better configuration - typically better monitoring capabilities (for example, the apache RA tests that the server is really working instead of just checking if the process exists) > > > > To make it short: your choice! ;) Right. But bear in mind that you should still prefer the OCF resource agents. Go with LSB agents only in case there's no corresponding OCF agent. > > > > greets Lars. > > Ok! :D > > Ciro > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
