On 8/20/07, Andreas Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/20/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/20/07, Andreas Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I was just looking for the default values for the "prereq" and
> > > "on_fail attribute" of operations in the crm.dtd shipped with
> > > Heartbeat v2.1.2 ... whithout success:
> > > ...
> > > prereq        (nothing|quorum|fencing)       #IMPLIED
> > > on_fail       (ignore|block|stop|restart|fence)     #IMPLIED>
> >
> > it depends on what the operation is and whether you have stonith enabled
> >
> > on_fail:
> > most default to 'restart' except 'stop' which defaults to 'block' if
> > stonith is not enabled and 'fence' if it is.
> >
> > prereq:
> > resources with type=stonith default to 'nothing'.
> > for everything else, they default to 'fencing' if that is enabled or
> > 'quorum' if not.
>
> ok
>
> >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > In Alan's latest tutorial I found that  fencing/fence seem to be the
> > > default values ... is that correct?
> > >
> > > Additionally Alan's tutorial does not list a "prereq" attribute for
> > > operations but a meta-attribute called "start_prereq" for the
> > > primitive ... a leftover from older heartbeat versions?
> >
> > correct
> >
> > > Wouldn't it be a nice feature to automatically include all default
> > > values in the cib for attributes that are not set explicitly ... or
> > > make it a configureable option to let heartbeat do that?
> >
> > well that would make it much larger and since some of the defaults
> > depend on other aspects of the configuration, it would likely cause
> > more problems than its worth
>
> Hmm ... so there is no way to get a quick overview of all currently
> used default values for a running configuration ... without
> investigating ptest output? I understand it is to much information to
> keep in the running config but an extra option e.g. to 'ptest' that
> gives  a 'full' config  could be quite useful IMHO.

the challenge is doing it in such a way that its useful but not horribly noisy.
its worth pointing out that a lot of this logging used to exist but
was removed for just this reason
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to