Good news, thank you Dejan
On 8/21/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:47:07PM +0200, peter panda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i'm planing to deploy Heartbeat as a high availability solution. I have > a > > scenario but i'm not sure if Heartbeat can handle it. In fact i have a > > server (serverA) with Apache and openLDAP running on it (on the same > > serverA). i want to make this server highly-avaialbale by adding two > nodes, > > the first node (serverB) running a backup Apache server and the second > node > > (serverC) running a backup openLDAP server; so if the the Apache server > > fails on serverA the serverB will be triggered and if the openLDAP fails > on > > serverA it's serverC that will be triggered. > > > > I don't know if i was clear. i yes, is it possible to handle that in > the > > same cluster using heartbeat? > > Definitely yes with Heartbeat v2. You have even an option to run > a load balancing solution: one host running one apache and the > master LDAP, another running slave LDAP, and the third running > the second apache (though the apache depends on where your web > pages are stored). Look for master/slave resources at > > http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/Concepts/MultiState > > Another solution, simpler to configure, would be one node for > Apache, one for the master LDAP, and the third one as backup in > case one of the first two fails. > > > > > thank you > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
