On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 03:10:37PM +0200, Andreas Kurz wrote: > On 8/23/07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 05:23:12PM +0800, mingdao lu wrote: > > > hi, all > > > > > > In my system, there are 3 nodes in a cluster. Node A and Node B are > > > working > > > node. Node C will be the spare one. > > > Either node A or node B is down, node c will takeove it. > > > Could you tell me how to configure the deadtime, warntime and keepalive > > > time > > > to keep the "takeover time" in one second? > > > > IIRC you can specify all times in milliseconds by appending "ms". > > But I'm not sure will you still get a subsecond failover time > > because there are quite a few processes involved: ccm > > (membership), pe (policy engine), te (transitioner), and finally > > resource agents. Please report your findings. > > depending on the features required/expected going with v1 config ... > crm off ... would be a better choice?
Yes, I think so. The v1 is a much simpler thing: less features, supports only two nodes, no resource monitoring. Actually, IIRC, there were subsecond failovers already reported with v1. > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot > > > Mingdao Lu > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-HA mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
