On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 04:18:53PM +0200, Christian Rishøj wrote: > In our setup I am seeing the lrmd take up quite a lot of CPU time. From top: > > 14365 nobody 18 0 95660 35m 1560 S 1 0.9 80:44.76 lrmd
I know of at least two places where it could be better. But, I should finally profile the thing. BTW, can you post your configuration. Or send it to me. > In the syslog, I see a lot a activity like this: > > Aug 23 16:00:19 dub lrmd: [14365]: info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at > 4361099980 should have started at 4361099880 > Aug 23 16:02:21 dub lrmd: [14365]: WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch > function for SIGCHLD was delayed 1000 ms (> 100 ms) before being > called (GSource: 0x619158) > Aug 23 16:02:21 dub lrmd: [14365]: info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at > 4361112160 should have started at 4361112060 > Aug 23 16:04:22 dub lrmd: [14365]: WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch > function for SIGCHLD was delayed 1000 ms (> 100 ms) before being > called (GSource: 0x619158) > Aug 23 16:04:22 dub lrmd: [14365]: info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at > 4361124338 should have started at 4361124238 > > Any clues what is going on here? Yes. See the discussion in http://old.linux-foundation.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1684 > Running HA 2.1.2. > > Thanks, > Christian > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
