On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 03:35:54PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In our active/pasive 2 node cluster we are running Redhat Enterprise 3
> with heartbeat 1.2.3.  We had to upgrade the kernel on these systems and
> found that the ipfail module will not work correctly with the new
> kernel. We decided to upgrade to heartbeat 2.0.2 since there were

2.0.2 is very old. Can you upgrade to something newer?

> packages for RH EL3.  We upgraded the standby node using same V1 configs
> that were on the system unchanged and everything worked seamlessly.  We
> also tried a manual switchover to the newly upgraded system and that
> also worked well.  The only thing we see in the log files that we would
> like to get clarification on is the following entries that are seen on
> the newly upgraded system:
> 
> ==> /var/log/ha-log <==
> heartbeat[2024]: 2007/08/29_15:07:48 WARN: Performed 1 more non-realtime
> malloc calls.
> heartbeat[2024]: 2007/08/29_15:07:48 info: Total non-realtime malloc
> bytes: 937984
> 
> They only occur once every 10 minutes +- a few seconds.  We are
> wondering if this is related to the fact that we are running to
> different versions of heartbeat on the nodes and will go away when we
> upgrade the other system.  Also, we saw a message in the log that
> said: 
> 
> heartbeat[2024]: 2007/08/29_14:00:09 info: flow control disabled due to
> different version heartbeat

IIRC, there was an issue running r2 on the one node and a r1 on
the other that had been fixed a few months ago. At any rate, you
should be better off with the same release on both nodes.

> We haven't been able to find any references to this Warn message and was
> hoping someone could shed some light on what it's trying to tell us.
> 
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to