On 9/18/07, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/18/07, Robert Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Whereas it arguably doesn't make sense to have an empty group, > > >pengine still should not segfault. Please file a bug. > > fixed
I saw that thanks! > > > Well it sure made sense to me, since the services where there before, > and > > the group was supposed to be the next thing to be removed. > > why not just remove the group - doing so will take everything with it > > unless you're using the gui which is broken on too many levels to > bother talking about > Well if I'd known that it's working that way of cause I'd done that. To me it was logical to remove everything in the reversed order of how I added the resources. Well now I'm aware of what can happen :) _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
