Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 07:23:43AM -0500, Dave Augustus wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:33 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 05:04:16PM -0500, Dave Augustus wrote:
6 servers- all running heartbeat
1 is LVS loadbalancer
the other 5 are lvs realservers
2 resource groups:
1 for the loadbalancer
1 CLONE resource group for the real servers
The loadbalancer can be ANY of the 6 servers.
If a server is NOT the load balancer, then it runs as a real server.
Is this a supported configuration?
Yes. If I understood correctly. Just setup a clone with
clone_node_max set to 1. And an extra constraint to make room for
the other resource which would say "don't run these two on the
same node". Furthermore, make sure that the score for the
loadbalancer resource is always higher than for the clone.
OK, I setup currently has 4 nodes. I clone_node_max to 1 and it ran a
resource group *twice* on the same node.
Is this a bug?
That shouldn't have happened. Please post the configuration and
logs.
i think this might be related to my report earlier this month and the
changeset: http://hg.beekhof.net/lha/crm-dev/rev/b570d7658acc
so using the current interim build will resolve this issue.
otherwise, you can use a constraint to not allow clone:0 and clone:1 on
the same host.
lg,
raoul
--
____________________________________________________________________
DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technischer Leiter
IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OEG web. http://www.ipax.at
Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030
FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15
____________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
