On 10/12/07, Daniel X Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > matilda matilda wrote: > > first to your question: I'm pretty sure you can't configure that. > > My question or better interest is: For what do you need that? > > I guessed that :) I'm also hoping that there's a relatively easy way we > could implement support for such a feature that might be useful to the > community. > > > The group primarily for handling the group as one entity, ordered > > or unordered. Their will be never a "at the same time" anyway. > > So, if your RA is called with "a,b,c" what does it do with that? > > Does the RA control the sequence? Start/Stop it at the same time, > > which will never happen? > > We currently implement the desired behaviour by having a list just like > that and a single resource. The single resource starts multiple > sub-resources.
ok > But this prevents us from adding/removing sub-resources > effectively as HB knows nothing of them. in what way does HB prevent this? if you change the value then we'll tell your resource the new value. > > I'm really interested in that use case. It's morning here and I > > can only imagine that you want to dynamically order the way the > > parts are handled. > > Each resource within the group needs a number of sub-resources > started/stopped and the sequence is mixed up between the resources when > starting/stopping everything together. define "mixed up" > Hope this explains it! not really - but maybe i'm thick _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
