On 2007-11-06T21:56:55, Andreas Mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our solution: (Very) long timeout values for monitoring actions.
Yes.
> Is this the only solution? Would it be feasible to let the monitor
> action of the RA run with higher priority? Have I forgot something?
No, this is not really feasible.
The alternative to this would be async monitoring, where a daemon would
constantly run and send async failure notifications to lrmd (and thus to
crmd) when a failure is detected. Becuase the daemon would constantly
run, it'd be less prone to fork/exec load etc and lower the likelihood
of congestion. (And the contribution to it, as well!)
But longer timeouts are really, really the way to go.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
