I have now tried using heartbeat-2.0.7 (newest version from backports.org). And it seems to work fine, so I will be using that instead.
In the process I found one bug in my configuration. I don't see how it could cause this problem, but maybe you do... On deb-hp-mla-hlrtest "bcast eth0" should have been "bcast bond0". In heartbeat-2 it could not communicate with the other node with this config, but I am quite sure it could in heatbeat-1. Venlig Hilsen / Regards Morten -- Morten Laursen, M.Sc.S.E. RTX Telecom A/S - http://www.rtx.dk/ Direct phone: (+45) 96 32 24 03 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Morten Laursen > Sent: 8. november 2007 18:26 > To: Alan Robertson > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [Linux-HA] RE: Missing gratious ARP > > > The files are identical (except the commented-out ucast line) > > For reference, the host IPs are: > 10.10.150.16 master (mla-test2) > 10.10.130.36 slave /deb-hp-mla-hlrtest) > 10.10.130.37 virtual IP > > logfacility daemon # Log to syslog as facility "daemon" > node mla-test2 deb-hp-mla-hlrtest # List our cluster members > keepalive 2 # Send one heartbeat each second > warntime 3 > deadtime 10 # Declare nodes dead after 10 seconds > #ucast eth0 10.10.130.36 # Unicast comm to peer's static IP > bcast eth0 > # Ping our router and other stuff on the local network to monitor > ethernet > # connectivity > ping_group nw 10.10.10.254 10.10.10.10 10.10.10.11 > auto_failback off # Don't fail back automatically > respawn hacluster /usr/lib/heartbeat/ipfail # Failover on network > failure > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alan Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 8. november 2007 18:07 > > To: Morten Laursen > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Missing gratious ARP > > > > Morten Laursen wrote: > > > Hi Alan > > > > > > Thankyou for the input, but that is not it: I have double > > checked the > > > config. This log is from the slave which had it's network > > connection > > > disconneted. It says that nw is daed which seems correct to > > me, since > > > NIC is disconnected? (nw i the router and 2 DNS servers > on the local > > > network) > > > > > > It seems the log got mangled in the mail, maybe you > overlooked the > > > [RECONNECT] line. I'll try to include it again. > > > > What I saw was that a node went through these three statuses: > > dead > > ping > > up > > > > No single node should EVER go through both ping and up statuses. > > > > Please send your ha.cf files from both machines. > > > > -- > > Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... > > Let me claim from you at all times your undisguised > > opinions." - William Wilberforce > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
