On Nov 16, 2007, at 4:03 AM, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote:
Hi,
I confirmed a Master/Slave function.
I confirmed it with the development version.
When there was one resource in Master/Slave, Master was set
definitely.
============
Last updated: Fri Nov 16 11:31:02 2007
Current DC: rh44-2 (86600d98-4564-433a-8ad7-aca0ca59382a)
2 Nodes configured.
2 Resources configured.
============
Node: rh44-1 (782b1222-d1b9-4993-8f0d-b8b67801a2c8): online
Node: rh44-2 (86600d98-4564-433a-8ad7-aca0ca59382a): online
Resource Group: test
resource_1 (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr): Started rh44-1
Master/Slave Set: ms-sf
master_slave_Stateful:0 (heartbeat::ocf:Stateful):
Started rh44-2
master_slave_Stateful:1 (heartbeat::ocf:Stateful):
Master rh44-1
However, I do not become Master when I make a resource the group.
Interesting... I'll look into this today
============
Last updated: Fri Nov 16 11:35:03 2007
Current DC: rh44-1 (782b1222-d1b9-4993-8f0d-b8b67801a2c8)
2 Nodes configured.
2 Resources configured.
============
Node: rh44-1 (782b1222-d1b9-4993-8f0d-b8b67801a2c8): online
Node: rh44-2 (86600d98-4564-433a-8ad7-aca0ca59382a): online
Resource Group: test
resource_1 (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr): Started rh44-1
Master/Slave Set: ms-sf
Resource Group: grp_ms_sf:0
master_slave_Stateful:0 (heartbeat::ocf:Stateful):
Started rh44-2
Resource Group: grp_ms_sf:1
master_slave_Stateful:1 (heartbeat::ocf:Stateful):
Started rh44-1
Will this be a bug?
(I attached the information of two patterns.)
Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
<
report_ok
.tar
.gz
>
<report_problem.tar.gz>_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
