Hi, On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 08:30:43AM +0100, Frank wrote: > > > >Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:52:05 +0100 > >From: Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] lrmd consuming too much cpu and a lot of logs > >To: General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> > >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > >Hi, > > > >On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 01:03:32PM +0100, Frank wrote: > > > >>> Hi, > >>> we are working with heartbeat 2.1.2 with the centOS rpms (on a Red Hat > >>> Linux) > >>> After some time of having heartbeat working on a server, we have > >>noticed > that lrmd process starts consuming a lot > >>> of CPU time (40 to 90 %) an the log file is full of messages like: > >>> > >>> lrmd[21117]: 2007/11/22_13:00:58 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch > >>function > for SIGCHLD was delayed 660 ms (> 100 ms) before being called > >>(GSource: > 0x87700e0) > >>> lrmd[21117]: 2007/11/22_13:00:58 info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at > >>> 60955980 should have started at 60955914 > >>> lrmd[21117]: 2007/11/22_13:00:58 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch > >>function > for SIGCHLD took too long to execute: 570 ms (> 30 ms) > >>(GSource: 0x87700e0) > >>> lrmd[21117]: 2007/11/22_13:00:59 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch > >>function > for SIGCHLD was delayed 350 ms (> 100 ms) before being called > >>(GSource: > 0x87700e0) > >>> lrmd[21117]: 2007/11/22_13:00:59 info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at > >>> 60956119 should have started at 60956084 > >>> lrmd[21117]: 2007/11/22_13:00:59 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch > >>function > for SIGCHLD took too long to execute: 380 ms (> 30 ms) > >>(GSource: 0x87700e0) > >>> lrmd[21117]: 2007/11/22_13:01:00 WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch > >>function > for SIGCHLD was delayed 340 ms (> 100 ms) before being called > >>(GSource: > 0x87700e0) > >>> lrmd[21117]: 2007/11/22_13:01:00 info: G_SIG_dispatch: started at > >>> 60956238 should have started at 60956204 > >>> > >>> I've seen a similar issue on the lists affecting version 2.1.0, and > >>> solved as a bug. Is it the same problem? > >>> Is there any way to solve it? > >> > > > >Both issues have been solved a few months ago. You can try with > >to apply the patches yourself (they were mentioned a few times in > >the archives), or wait for the next release, or use on of > >Andrew's 2.1.2 interim releases. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Deja > > Ok. Just a question. The patch affects only "lrmd" or other files?
Both are in libraries which are used by all heartbeat programs. Thanks, Dejan > It's > just to change only affected files. > > Frank > > > -- > Aquest missatge ha estat analitzat per MailScanner > a la cerca de virus i d'altres continguts perillosos, > i es considera que est? net. > For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
