Hi, On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:52:33AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On Nov 28, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 06:24:34PM +0100, Alt, Martin wrote: > >>Hello all, > >> > >>I am planning to use heartbeat (version 2) to increase the > >>availability of some services running in a cluster and I am > >>currently stuck with two questions (one of which is rather > >>general and not directly related to heartbeat - but I hope > >>someone can help me anyway ;-)). > >> > >>The setup is as follows: the cluster contains 10 nodes, each > > > >How big is your configuration? If the size reflects the number of > >nodes, which is impressive, then it could be that only with the > >future releases (there should be one in December), Heartbeat > >would manage. > > The current interim release should be able to cope - its quite a bit > better at not exceeding heartbeat's communication queues.
Cool. > You might hit heartbeat's internal message size limits - but thats > just a #define that you can increase if necessary But we have, at least I hope so, the IPC size (aka compression now works) fix. See http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev/rev/1dad5ee4ac98 Cheers, Dejan > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
