On Dec 7, 2007 7:27 PM, Jeff Humes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I figure out this issue just after I compile this email.
> the second node did not have the link in /etc/init.d for the lsb script.
>
> All seems to be working now.
>
> I am confused a little about this this works though.  When I start a
> resource on one node, does it automatically run the stop of that
> resource on the other nodes?

Not quite.

We check to make sure its not already running before we start it anywhere.
In your case, this check would have failed (since the script didn't
exist) and then the stop would have failed... etc etc

>
> -JPH
>
>
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 7, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Jeff Humes wrote:
> >
> >> I have created a  simple heartbeat cluster:
> >>
> >> 2 Centos 4.5 nodes
> >>
> >> HB version:
> >> heartbeat-pils-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
> >> heartbeat-stonith-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
> >> heartbeat-gui-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
> >> heartbeat-2.1.2-3.el4.centos
> >>
> >>
> >> Here is the issue I see, and I dont know what I am doing wrong.
> >> I have a simple group (*"GROUP_knworks_assp"*) setup.  It is
> >> colocated and ordered.
> >> the issue is that I can get the IP address to work, but the LSB init
> >> script will not work.
> >>
> >> I have followed the document:
> >>   http://www.linux-ha.org/LSBResourceAgent
> >> it meets all of the requirements and passes all the correct return
> >> codes to be LSB Compliant.
> >>
> >> The IP address is on node1, and the LSB script says: unmanaged and
> >> failed.
> >>
> >> crm_mon -1 output:
> >> Resource Group: GROUP_knworks_assp
> >>   knworks_assp_ip     (heartbeat::ocf:IPaddr2):       Started asknmapr01
> >>   knworks_assp_initscript     (lsb:knworks_assp_init_script.sh):
> >> Started asknmapr02 (unmanaged) FAILED
> >>
> >> Failed actions:
> >>   knworks_assp_initscript_monitor_0 (node=asknmapr02, call=77,
> >> rc=254): Error
> >>   knworks_assp_initscript_stop_0 (node=asknmapr02, call=78, rc=254):
> >> Error
> >>
> >
> > 254?  that can't be good - especially since thats supposed to be the
> > massaged rc value (the raw rc is mapped to one of the entries in the
> > UNIFORM_RET_EXECRA enum).
> >
> > what do the logs say?
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to