Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > Recently somebody also had difficulties with hbaping, but IIRC it > was the other way around, i.e. the 64bit didn't work. How comes > that you have hbaping at all? Do you use need that? > > Thanks, > > Dejan > Hi Dejan,
Hmmm, didn't see that question coming. Doesn't everybody with a SAN and heartbeat use hbaping? :) I use hbaping enable the cluster to failover if the SAN connection breaks on one node. The individual nodes do not have redundant paths to the SAN, so if a hba or a fibre cable on one node breaks, the resources should migrate to the other node. Simply using the filesystem ocf monitor action isn't sufficient in our case, the SAN mount is remounted empty and read only when the SAN switch port is manually turned off to simulate problems. The filesystem monitor action doesn't notice. Suggestions welcome, this recompiling thing is labor intensive. If I don't need hbaping to make resources migrate in case of SAN problems, that would be great. regards, Johan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
