Hi, On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:40:32AM +0000, R.I. Pienaar wrote: > Hello, > > > > >From the tarball for 213 we have in the same spec file: > > > > Which tarball do you refer to? > > http://linux-ha.org/download/heartbeat-2.1.3.tar.gz > > > > > > %define HA_CCMUID 498 > > > %define HA_APIGID 496 > > > > This may be set in the specfile, but not in the original one. > > Whoever did the specfile must've done this on purpose. > > sure, my point is it was this way in the heartbeat-2.1.2.tar.gz above > also so I dont think we should lay blame at CentOS or expect them to > address it, the problem is clearly been introduced in > http://linux-ha.org/download/heartbeat-2.1.3.tar.gz
You're very right. It's definitely not the problem with the CentOS. Thanks for researching this. I have no idea how those ids came up. The ConfigureMe script should have set them depending on the distribution. At any rate, the CentOS maintainer should replace this with whatever was used there in 2.1.2 and rebuild the packages (cc-ing Johnny with apologies). OTOH, if the user/group already exists, which is the case when upgrading, the user/group ids are inherited. Thanks, Dejan > > -- > R.I.Pienaar > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
