Hi,

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 05:56:10PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I run this combination.
> 
> # rpm -qa | grep heartbeat
> heartbeat-2.1.3-13.1
> heartbeat-common-2.1.3-13.1
> heartbeat-common-devel-2.1.3-13.1
> heartbeat-resources-2.1.3-13.1
> pacemaker-heartbeat-0.6.0-20.2
> 
> sequence of operation is here;
> (1) start up three nodes 
>       (node-a, node-b, node-c. DC = node-c)
> 
> (2) down the interconnect LAN of node-c
>       [node-c]# iptables -A INPUT  -i eth2 -j DROP
>       [node-c]# iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth2 -j DROP
> 
> (3) split brain comes up
>       <node-a + node-b> vs. <node-c>
> 
> (4) up the interconnect LAN of node-c
>       [node-c]# iptables -F
> 
> It seems that Heartbeat can handle the recovering from a split brain, 
> but I found the strange message in ha-log.
> During the recovering, node-b losts node-a for some reason.
> 
> crmd[7463]: 2008/02/15_17:40:54 info: ccm_event_detail: NEW MEMBERSHIP:
> trans=6, nodes=2, new=1, lost=1 n_idx=0, new_idx=2, old_idx=5
> crmd[7463]: 2008/02/15_17:40:54 info: ccm_event_detail:         CURRENT:
> node-c [nodeid=2, born=1]
> crmd[7463]: 2008/02/15_17:40:54 info: ccm_event_detail:         CURRENT:
> node-b [nodeid=1, born=6]
> crmd[7463]: 2008/02/15_17:40:54 info: ccm_event_detail:         NEW:
> node-c [nodeid=2, born=1]
> crmd[7463]: 2008/02/15_17:40:54 info: ccm_event_detail:         LOST:
> node-a [nodeid=0, born=2]
> crmd[7463]: 2008/02/15_17:40:54 info: crm_update_peer: Node node-a is now:
> lost
> crmd[7463]: 2008/02/15_17:40:54 info: crm_update_peer: Node node-c is now:
> member
> 
> node-a and node-b were peer before and there is no need to fall away the
> membership.
> Instance ID is normal.
> Is it expected behavior or the CCM bug again ?

Definitely not expected. Since there was no message about link
going up/down for node-b, it looks like a bug to me. Is this
reproducable? If so, could you set debug to 1 and rerun. And file
a bugzilla.

Thanks,

Dejan

> I attached the hb_report.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Junko Ikeda
> 
> NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION


> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to