The reason I began researching this type of replication is that we had
several applications that could not be easily clustered because they
had some persistant data such as logs and state information that was
stored locally on disk. So it seemed like the best way was to create
drbd disks, I went with the active/active disk configuration in DRBD8,
and putting OCFS2 on top of it.

First note that as a rule of thumb I never build custom kernels. Maybe
I am too new school, but I figure if the application does not work
with the kernel I am running now it is very bleeding edge and probably
not ready for mainstream deployment.

I did find that OCFS2 and or DRBB 0.8 would not work with the stock
FC5 kernel. A yum update to the newest kernel got the system to the
point of running the software in memory without Dynamic Link issues.
Firstly I had to handle the drbd partitioning. This is not a big deal
but, its not 1,2,3. You can not really kickstart it well. have to
configure OCFS2, have to open firewall ports, also add a crossover
cable, put the system on two networks.

But I did get it up and working in active/active mode. I should have
ran UnixBench on it to see the raw performance but I did not.

Also at the time the OCF could not handle active/active drbd
configurations. I hacked together some LSB scripts for DRBD, ocfs2.

All in all the setup time was vast. I felt that I could get better
value out of one machine well administered and backed up. the major
problem is that you had to be an HA expert, a DRBD expert, and an OCFS
expert to get anything working on the systems.

I think the active active ocfs2 would be great for a large SAN type
disk, but it was just too much management for servers you would like
to replicate.

On Feb 18, 2008 11:39 AM, Atul Athavale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You may find some starting point at
>
> http://wiki.linux-ha.org/AtulAthavale
>
> or at
>
> http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/578
>
> Regards,
>
> Atul Athavale.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to