I have verified that it is being run as root so I am a bit confused.
I also remember reading that the preferred way of doing command
expressions now in BASH is not with backticks but with ${} do I
substituted

IPMITOOL=`which ipmitool 2</dev/null`   with
IPMITOOL="${which ipmitool 2</dev/null}"

But that did not do the trick.

I have it working when I hard code the location of the ipmitool so I
will stick with that for now.  After debugging I have determined that
the problem is that the IPMITOOL variable is not being set by the
`which ipmitool 2</dev/null`  command.

many thanks

Doug
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>  On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:39:29AM -0500, Doug Lochart wrote:
>  > After hacking up the  /usr/lib64/stonith/plugins/external/ipmi script
>  > I have discovered what is the problem.  In the script the IPMITOOL
>  > shell variable is being set by `which ipmitool 2>/dev/null` command.
>  > This returns the proper location when run by a regular user or by
>  > root.  However I just checked and saw that heartbeat is running as
>  > user nobody.
>
>  There are many processes and some of them do run as nobody most
>  of the time. They all have ability to resume the original (root)
>  user id. At least in this case, the stonithd should run a stonith
>  plugin (ipmi) as root.
>
>
>  > I installed heartbeat from an RPM so I do no other
>  > configuration for it because usually all the user accounts are added
>  > for you in an RPM.  Is heartbeat supposed to run as user nobody?  If
>  > so am I right in my assumption that the 'which' command is not
>  > returning the path to the ipmitool _because_ it is being run by
>  > nobody?
>
>  Don't think so, but you can try it yourself by inserting sth like:
>
>  id > /tmp/ipmi-$$.id
>
>  in the ipmi script. To fully debug you can also try:
>
>  set -x
>  exec 2>/tmp/ipmi-$$.debug
>
>  BTW, I just checked some old ha.cf of mine and they all have sth
>  similar to what you used. It must be that the problem is within
>  the script.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  Dejan
>
>
>
>  > I can hardcode the variable in my script but I would rather get it
>  > working the way it is supposed to work.  This little issue may
>  > foreshadow other more major ones if I don't get it straight now.
>  >
>  > thanks,
>  >
>  > regards
>  >
>  > Doug
>  >
>  >
>  > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Doug Lochart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > > I tried Dejan's suggestion but I received the same result.  Chun have
>  > >  you had the cluster working and stonith _not_ complaining for a few
>  > >  days and _then_ it started to complain about the 256 code?  Or maybe
>  > >  you are just now seeing that stonith is giving this message?
>  > >
>  > >  I believe the problem may be how stonith is interpreting the ipmi
>  > >  scripts return value.
>  > >
>  > >  One thing I have seen in my googling is that there are not many
>  > >  examples of people using stonith and ipmi at least not in the non crm
>  > >  (version 1) way.  Can anyone reading this post acknowledge that they
>  > >  are using it and offer any suggestions.
>  > >
>  > >  In case it matters (because it might) I am running on CentOS 5.1
>  > >  (fully patched as of last week) on x86_64 system.
>  > >
>  > >  thanks and regards,
>  > >
>  > >  Doug
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Chun Tian (binghe)
>  > >  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > >  > Hi, there
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  >  > I have tested stonith from the command line and was able to reset 
> the
>  > >  >  > target PC.  On the command I used the following:
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > stonith  -t external/ipmi -T reset -p "capestor2 10.43.120.134 
> ADMIN
>  > >  >  > mypassword" capestor2
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > This worked marvelously!  So then I move the stuff into the ha.cf.
>  > >  >  > Not having much in the way of examples for ipmi this was my best 
> guess
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > stonith_host capestor1 external/ipmi capestor2 10.43.120.134 ADMIN
>  > >  >  > mypassword
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > Syslog gives me this:
>  > >  >  > Feb 21 17:20:24 capestor2 heartbeat: [4133]: info: Checking status 
> of
>  > >  >  > STONITH device [IPMI STONITH device ]
>  > >  >  > Feb 21 17:20:24 capestor2 heartbeat: [4133]: info: glib:
>  > >  >  > external_run_cmd: Calling '/usr/lib64/stonith/plugins/external/ipmi
>  > >  >  > status' returned 256
>  > >  >
>  > >  >  I met this too.
>  > >  >
>  > >  >  I guess this calling actually return 0 but SOMETIMES stonith/external
>  > >  >  thought the return value is 256...
>  > >  >
>  > >  >  I have a running Heartbeat 4-node cluster with stonith enabled, a few
>  > >  >  days ago, I got a return value 256 when 'ipmi status' be calling.
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > Feb 21 17:20:24 capestor2 heartbeat: [4133]: ERROR: STONITH device
>  > >  >  > IPMI STONITH device  not operational!
>  > >  >  > Feb 21 17:20:24 capestor2 heartbeat: [4111]: WARN: Managed
>  > >  >  > STONITH-stat process 4133 exited with return code 1.
>  > >  >  > Feb 21 17:20:24 capestor2 heartbeat: [4111]: ERROR: STONITH status
>  > >  >  > operation failed.
>  > >  >  > Feb 21 17:20:24 capestor2 heartbeat: [4111]: info: This may mean 
> that
>  > >  >  > the STONITH device has failed!
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > I even went so far as to copy the ipmi plugin to test-ipmi and
>  > >  >  > hardcoded the values for the variables that are passed in my
>  > >  >  > heartbeat.  That worked.
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > Any ideas as to what I may be doing wrong?
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > thanks
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > Doug
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  >
>  > >  >  > --
>  > >  >  > What profits a man if he gains the whole world yet loses his soul?
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  > > _______________________________________________
>  > >  >  > Linux-HA mailing list
>  > >  >  > [email protected]
>  > >  >  > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>  > >  >  > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>  > >  >
>  > >  >  _______________________________________________
>  > >  >  Linux-HA mailing list
>  > >  >  [email protected]
>  > >  >  http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>  > >  >  See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>  > >  >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  --
>  > >  What profits a man if he gains the whole world yet loses his soul?
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > What profits a man if he gains the whole world yet loses his soul?
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Linux-HA mailing list
>  > [email protected]
>  > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>  > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>  _______________________________________________
>  Linux-HA mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
>  See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>



-- 
What profits a man if he gains the whole world yet loses his soul?
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to