Hi,

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:47:25PM +0700, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
> Hi all,
> First of all, little by little I venture into more feature of V2. It's 
> excellent :) I'm now setting up a test bed of vsftpd and nfs on 3 Centos5.
> 
> I'm spotting an interesting behaviour. I notice that linux-ha is able to 
> determine the correct order of resources automatically?
> 
> For example, I set no order, but linux-ha is able to know that these 
> resources 
> is started on the following order:
> 1. filesystem, mounting /var/ftp
> 2. ip address
> 3. the vsftpd daemon
> 
> Is it the intended behaviour? Or it just guesses the order by the sequence we 
> create the resource? (I create the resource filesystem first, then ip, then 
> daemon).

I guess that you just got lucky. If there's no order, the
resources are started in parallel.

> Another interested thing:
> I create a resource group for NFS:
> 1. ip address
> 2. the nfs daemon
> 
> When I setup no order, it runs ok. It starts from ip then the nfs daemon. 
> It's 
> ok. Then I 'intentionally' create an order for NFS, but in reverse. NFS 
> daemon first, then ip. It fails to start. Is it also an intended behaviour?

No. It must be that something in the resource agents failed due
to the reverse order.

> Do we need to create order at all?

Yes.

> Any insight is really appreciated :)
> 
> Thank you very much.

Thanks,

Dejan

> -- 
> Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial 
> http://linux2.arinet.org
> 14:45:38 up 2:29, 2.6.22-14-generic GNU/Linux 
> Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org
> The real challenge of teaching is getting your students motivated to learn.



> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to