At my organization, we have been putting a lot of work into Linux-HA implementation. I have even wrote an OCF Resource Agent for exporting NFS shares using exportfs.
I have 2 concerns with Linux-HA 1. I heard that Linux-HA is moving away from resource groups. To me this doesn't seem to make sense It is an easy way to organize, start and stop resources that are related. Can anyone confirm or deny this accusation. 2. Sometime when an unrelated resource is broken, I will change a different resource or resource group's target_role. Even though the cluster registers that the target_role has changed, the status of the resource WILL NOT change. In order for Linux-HA to be reliable, I can't worry about unrelated resources. Number 2 concerns me much more. While I am running 2.1, most distributions ship with 2.07. Is there an advantage to having 2.07? 2.08 is the version which implements the quorum server and is very important. What might cause Linux-HA to be unresponsive to changes? Thanks in advance, Jason _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
