On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Dominik Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > three questions on the "failcount" attribute. I am running 2.0.8, and yes > I know I should upgrade ... :-( > > > > Good to know you know :) > > > > > a) Is it possible that the "failcount" for a ressource/node is only > available after a failure? On a not-yet-failed ressource I see: > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sbin # ./crm_failcount -G -U isdl601 -r caebench.proc > > > name=fail-count-caebench.proc value=(null) > > > Error performing operation: The object/attribute does not exist > > > > > > > Is this intentional? > > > > At least the normal behaviour.
in that version > > > > > From a consistency point of view, creating it with a value of "0" would > make sense. RFE? > > > > b) It would be nice to have "crm_mon" display the failcounts for all > resources on all nodes, or mark nodes with any failcount > 0 as "failed" or > "online/failed". RFE? > > > > Yep, would be nice. Request that as an enhancement in the bugzilla. which is what happens in newer version :) _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
