On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Luis Motta Campos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Luis Motta Campos > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> > random question - did you install from source or packages? where did > >> > you get them from? > >> > >> Packages, from CentOS 5.1 repositories. > > > > Hmmm > > Looks like they've applied some extra patches since the version SHA > > doesn't match anything we've produced. > > I disagree. I got my package from > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.1/extras/x86_64/RPMS/heartbeat-devel-2.1.3-2.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm > > Which corresponds to the source package from > > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.1/extras/SRPMS/heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos.src.rpm
> > I got also the source from linux-ha.org, > > http://linux-ha.org/download/heartbeat-2.1.3.tar.gz > > un-tarred and compared them (with "diff -rBub"). > diff says the packages are the same. Aha! I found it, seems there were some changes in http://hg.linux-ha.org/test/ that weren't merged back into http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev (or anywhere else) > The SRPM from CentOS doesn't have any patches listed in the source package. > > Now, the Suse.org CentOS mirror you pointed me at have a more recent > package, and patches: I know, I maintain those ones :-) Anyway, back to the crash... I've added an explicit check for NULL in that function and I've also updated the crmd process to save the current configuration if the PE ever crashes. This means we'll be able to reproduce the crash and be 100% sure of the cause and that its fixed. So on the off chance I've not fixed it, we'll be able to debug it better next time. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
