On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag, 23. Mai 2008 12:43 schrieb Dominik Klein: >> > But how to include the resoruces into Linux-HA? OCF resoruce agent? of >> > heartbeat v1 compatible agents drbddisc? >> >> If you use a recent pacemaker version (>= 0.6.3) you should go with the >> OCF RA. >> >> There has been a lot of testing and fixing work on the whole >> master_slave resource management and I think it got quite a lot better. >> It behaves a lot more intuitive than it used to. >> >> Regards >> Dominik > > I want to go with the pacemaker. But is the RA safe? Can I use it in a > production environment with large partitions and critical databases? > > Michael. > > -- > Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff > MultiNET Services GmbH > Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany > Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0 > Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21 > mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75 > > mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: www.multinet.de > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375 > Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens > > --- > > PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B > Skype: misch42 > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >
I tried OCFS2 on top of active/active DRDB on top of LVM2 on FC5 I found these things. At the time the DRDB RA did not support active/active. The setup was a beast. ocfs configuration drbd configuration ha configuration partion configuration I had to mix and match finding kernels and OCFS and DRBD that were happy together. As well as OCFS2 RPM for my distro. open ports for linux HA open ports for ocfs open ports for drbd Multiple partitioning steps base system LVM, DRBD, When it locked up, which it seemed to do about once every 3 weeks i could access the locked system but could not reboot it! I was trying to make an open source active/active SAN, I will not say it wont work, but in the type I spent I wish I would have just purchased a solution. I think peeling back a couple of layers might be a better solution: DRBD, active/passive, ext3 Much less complexity, probably same result. INHO _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
