Hi Dejan, it doesn't work for me: bgstsapgtsls1:~ # /etc/init.d/heartbeat start Starting High-Availability services2008/05/28_12:05:47 INFO: Resource is stopped heartbeat[18617]: 2008/05/28_12:05:47 ERROR: Invalid Stonith configuration parameter [ bgstsapgtsls2 10.20.12.24 root password] heartbeat[18617]: 2008/05/28_12:05:47 ERROR: Heartbeat not started: configuration error. heartbeat[18617]: 2008/05/28_12:05:47 ERROR: Configuration error, heartbeat not started.
Thats my new config: bgstsapgtsls1:~ # cat /etc/ha.d/ha.cf | grep -v \# debugfile /var/log/ha-debug logfile /var/log/ha-log keepalive 2 deadtime 30 warntime 10 initdead 120 auto_failback off bcast eth2 bcast eth3 node bgstsapgtsls1 node bgstsapgtsls2 stonith_host * external/ibmrsa bgstsapgtsls2 10.20.12.24 root password What's wrong? Andreas Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gesendet von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 28.05.2008 11:55 Bitte antworten an General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> An General Linux-HA mailing list <[email protected]> Kopie Thema Re: [Linux-HA] Question to stonith and external/ibmrsa Hi, On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:32:51AM +0200, Andreas Reschke wrote: > Hello, > I've created a HA-Cluster with 2 IBM 3650 with RSA-Adapter and SuSE Linux > Enterprise 10 SP1 (64Bit). When the slave-server take over the service > (SAP), he must poweroff the master-server over the RSA-Adapter with the > Stonith-Module external/ibmrsa. But what is the syntax for the poweroff > and how can I include this in the ha.cf? > That's my ha.cf > > debugfile /var/log/ha-debug > logfile /var/log/ha-log > keepalive 2 > deadtime 30 > warntime 10 > initdead 120 > auto_failback off > bcast eth2 > bcast eth3 > node bgstsapgtsls1 > node bgstsapgtsls2 It's all described in the ha.cf delivered with the distribution. Add such a line: stonith_host * external/ibmrsa node rsaip user pass node: node to be managed rsaip: ip of the rsa If you're worried about security then try with stonith external/ibmrsa /etc/ha.d/ibmrsa.cf where ibmrsa.cf contains the configuration. If you're running v2 then the story's different. Take a look at the linux-ha.org web pages. Thanks, Dejan > > > Thanks for your help > > Andreas Reschke > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
