Ok,
# netstat -aunp
Aktive Internetverbindungen (Server und stehende Verbindungen)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
State PID/Program name
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32769 0.0.0.0:*
2377/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:514 0.0.0.0:*
1542/syslogd
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32771 0.0.0.0:*
2379/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32772 0.0.0.0:*
2381/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32773 0.0.0.0:*
2383/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32774 0.0.0.0:*
2385/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32775 0.0.0.0:*
2387/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:694 0.0.0.0:*
2387/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:694 0.0.0.0:*
2385/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:694 0.0.0.0:*
2383/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:694 0.0.0.0:*
2381/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:694 0.0.0.0:*
2379/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:694 0.0.0.0:*
2377/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8120 0.0.0.0:*
2210/tweety
udp 0 0 10.11.20.222:123 0.0.0.0:*
1701/ntpd
udp 0 0 10.11.20.224:123 0.0.0.0:*
1701/ntpd
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:123 0.0.0.0:*
1701/ntpd
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:123 0.0.0.0:*
1701/ntpd
I see six udp 694 ports here. This means udp bcast is still activated I think.
I thought ucast should replace bcast?
Thanks,
Achim
Achim Stumpf schrieb:
Hi,
Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb:
If you don't have bcast directives, then there really shouldn't
be any broadcasts. Don't know what those messages are about.
I don't have any bcast enabled:
use_logd yes
ucast bond0 10.11.20.221
ucast bond0 10.11.20.222
ucast eth2 10.11.20.223
ucast eth2 10.11.20.224
keepalive 1
deadtime 10
warntime 5
initdead 30 # depend on your hardware
bcast bond0 eth2
watchdog /dev/watchdog
ping_group routers 10.14.0.10 10.14.0.11 10.14.0.12 10.14.0.13
crm yes
node isintra5.fra
node isintra6.fra
respawn root /usr/lib64/heartbeat/pingd -m 100 -d 30s -a pingd
In the future I will have multiple heartbeat clusters each of a
pair. I am wondering, if I would put now a second independent
Cluster pair on the network, if they see each other and complain
about the bcast messages as I had before.
So far as I understood it now, ucast should prevent one of such
errors, of mutliple Clusters on the network.
Does it do now, what I want or not?
As long as you keep them on different UDP ports you should be OK.
Of course, with only ucast directives you could use the same UDP
port.
That's what I did before, but I thought ucast is a better solution for
that. Does anyone know why I still get this bcast log entries, and if
bcast is still acitvated. I thought bcast should be replaced by ucast to
get rid of this error messages in case of another cluster on the network.
Thanks,
Achim
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
