Greetings, we will be running a setup where our
resources are about 100 IP addresses, each with an
associated instance of pound (the web proxy/load
balancer), spread across three host machines.
We are thinking about our resource grouping
configuration. The obvious scheme would be to just
have about 100 resource groups, one for each pair of
IP/pound instances. Another method might be to have a
small number of large resource groups, maybe 6 each
with about 16 IPs and pound instances. In theory this
might make it easier to manually move resources from
one node to another.
Does anyone have any reason to think either scheme
would be preferable? Would it be notably difficult to
add or shift around resources with the second scheme?
Are there any constraints or quirks in linux-ha that
we might run into with either setup? Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
