On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:45, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I can only think of two things - system load (or CPU power, both of >> which would affect the timing) and whether you both have stonith >> enabled. > > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5160 @ 3.00GHz (x2) > -> lrmd restart. That's it.
actually, i was wrong... if you're using "crm on" then the node should (based on how the code works) always commit suicide. can you create a bug and attach a hb_report for this case please? > > Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz (x2) > -> lrmd restart, and somehow, heartbeat signoff crmd. > System reboot, after all. > >> Actually a third thing is the use of "crm yes" or "crm respawn" would >> also affect this. > > Both of them, "crm on" > I wonder why... > I have to find some other differences. > >> >> Are any of these things different between the two clusters? >> >> > Which is the appropriate behavior for heartbeat when lrmd is killed; >> > restart lrmd or system reboot? >> >> Partly it depends on your preference. >> >> My personal belief is that when STONITH is enabled, rebooting the node >> when any of the v2 processes exit offers no additional protection to >> beyond that provided by STONITH and makes the recovery time longer. >> >> Others have been known to disagree :-) >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
