On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 15:07, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 08:49:52AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 08:14, HIDEO YAMAUCHI >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> >> Which operation did you cause to fail? The monitor or the fencing >> >> operation? >> > When I caused fencing, I generated time-out in RA of STONITH. >> > >> > Possibly is this phenomenon improved in Pacemaker? >> >> By design the crm has no idea which node or plugin is used (or were >> tried and failed). >> So it would be impossible to for it recover the RA on its own. >> >> It _may_ make sense for the stonithd to unload any plugin that reports >> a failed stonith action (and thus causing the monitor to eventually >> fail) but I'll leave that for Dejan to think about :-) > > stonithd doesn't unload any plugins depending on failed actions.
right - it was a suggestion for a possible enhancement. no idea if its a good idea though. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
