Hi, We are now trying to show a good performance report to the potential customer. Our customer's requests are here; * There are more than 100 resources on one node. * 100 resources are included in one group, so they would start/stop sequentially. * Fail over for all of 100 resources should complete within 1 minute.
* Heartbeat stable 2.1 (maybe release as 2.1.4, soon) It took about 4 minutes for fail over. * Heartbeat-dev(5072025b79b8) + Pacemaker-0.7(ee6832884524) It took about 3 minutes for fail over. It's getting better! Is this some effect of the new xml parser? hb_report are so huge, I created the bugzilla as enhancement. http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1935 Do you have any good idea to speed up fail over time? It would be best if the performance improvement is available with Heartbeat 2.1.4. I know this kind of performance improvement is not so easy, But this is a matter of the greatest urgency If it comes in after the nearest release, we are planning to backport it to 2.1.4 for our customer individually. Best Regards, Junko Ikeda NTT DATA INTELLILINK CORPORATION _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
