Florent DUTHEIL a écrit :

I'm still convinced this (or something less "dirty hack looking" :)) should be modified in the upstream agent version.

About RO bind mounts, there is something that the FS agent now have to take in account: http://lwn.net/Articles/281157/ From 2.6.26 kernel, RO Bind mounts are now to be mounted like that (actually they don't exist before the 2.6.26 version... frightening):

   mount --bind /vital_data /untrusted_container/vital_data
   mount -o remount,ro /untrusted_container/vital_data


Non trivial, and not feasable right now with HB2.

Who is in charge of the FS Agent, and where can I contact him to draw his attention on this two points?

Regards,

Florent.


-- Disclaimer ------------------------------------
Ce message ainsi que les eventuelles pieces jointes constituent une 
correspondance privee et confidentielle a l'attention exclusive du destinataire 
designe ci-dessus. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire du present message ou une 
personne susceptible de pouvoir le lui delivrer, il vous est signifie que toute 
divulgation, distribution ou copie de cette transmission est strictement 
interdite. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, nous vous remercions d'en 
informer l'expediteur par telephone ou de lui retourner le present message, 
puis d'effacer immediatement ce message de votre systeme.
***
This e-mail and any attachments is a confidential correspondence intended only 
for use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended 
recipient or the agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or copying 
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify the sender by phone or by replying this 
message, and then delete this message from your system.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to