On 2008-07-18T19:19:39, "Dirk H. Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What I need is an interface alias with it's own address (like eth0:0)
>>> because of the routing protocol I use at the gateway cluster.
>> Just out of curiousity, what broken routing protocol requires that?
> Oh, it is not broken. It is OSPFv2 which requires that.
OSPFv2 doesn't require any particular interface names. That can only be
a broken implementation, and I'd be surprised if quagga or so really
required that - for sure they should be able to handle secondary
addresses w/o labels?
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
