Hi, On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:21:46AM -0400, Knight, Doug wrote: > All, > > Is there any problem with having the monitor interval time shorter than > the timeout?
No. The next (repeating) monitor operation is scheduled after the previous one finished. If one op takes longer to execute, the next one will start later. Thanks, Dejan > Here's the situation we're looking at. We have a resource > that needs to be frequently monitored, every 30 seconds. Most time, the > resource should be able to return a status within this period. However, > due to outside events, there are rare occasions when the monitor command > might take longer than this to complete, albeit with a successful > resource check. I'd like to be able to make the timeout something like > 45 seconds - 1 minute, but continue to monitor every 30 seconds (more > frequently, like every 15 seconds, if possible). Does this represent a > valid configuration? If not, what's the best way to handle a situation > like this? > > > > Thanks, > > Doug Knight > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
