> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:53:21PM +0000, Todd, Conor wrote: >> No, it's not a clone resource: the configuration is different >> for each node's riloe configuration, so there's one stonith >> resource for each node. Do I need to set up stonith resources >> as cloned for them to work? > > No. As long as there's at least one instance of a stonith > resource running that should be enough to shoot a node.
Of course ... one instance should be enough but isn't it safer to make sure that every node is able to stonith any other node ... no matter in which state the complete cluster is? > >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Kurz >> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 5:24 PM >> > To: General Linux-HA mailing list >> > Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] STONITH, default fencing time, forced-fencing >> > >> > >> > >> > > Hi! >> > > >> > > I've set up a five-node HA cluster running a bunch of services, and >> > > all >> > seems to be going well, although one node insists on telling >> > everyone else that its running any new resource which is >> > set-up but not activated. I use crm_resource -C to deal with >> > this situation, so it's not so bad. >> > > >> > > Anyway, these nodes are HP DL380-G5s, and so I'm using the riloe >> > > STONITH >> > script. I tested it by hand, and it works like a charm. >> > I've set up the STONITH resources so that they never run on >> > the same machine as the one they control. The other day, I >> > artificially caused a situation in which one of the nodes >> > should have been fenced. The cluster realized this and >> > "scheduled" it for fencing, but the fence never happened. >> > I'm wondering what this "scheduling" is, and what parameters >> > are available to control it? >> > >> > You mean: you configured one clone resource for every rilo >> > device and there runs a clone on every node except the one it >> > controlls? ... then it should have worked ... if not: log >> > files and your cib would be handy. >> > >> > I think there was even a post of Dejan to the list ... some >> > times ago.. >> > that said it is also save to run a stonith script on the node >> > it controlls as a node does not stonith itself. >> >> Right, but if a node is running its own stonith resource and then the >> node disappears, it will take even longer to fence it because the >> cluster is going to have to figure out who's going to run the node's >> stonith process before it can actually get around to doing the stoning >> -- er, stonith'ing. >> >> - Conor >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > -- : Andreas Kurz Tel +43-1-8178292-64 : : LINBIT® Information Technologies GmbH Fax +43-1-8178292-82 : : Vivenotgasse 48, A-1120 Vienna/Europe http://www.linbit.com : DRBD® ist eine eingetragene Marke der LINBIT® Information Technologies GmbH. DRBD® is a registered trademark of LINBIT® Information Technologies GmbH. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
