Hi Dejan,

> The timeouts should be finally fixed. Most parts of your patch
> were included. The changeset's at
> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-0.6:

I see.

We wish to express our gratitude for your correction.

Thank you.

Hideo Yamauchi.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dejan Muhamedagic
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:51 AM
> To: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Re: About time-out of STONITH.
>
>
> Hi Hideo-san,
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:55:46AM +0900, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > > I see the point of using setpgid(2). Thanks for the patch. I'll
> > > give it a more thorough review next week along with the patch I
> > > already have for this problem.
> > All right.
> > The last patch entrusts you.
> >
> > Please send a patch if I help you.
>
> The timeouts should be finally fixed. Most parts of your patch
> were included. The changeset's at
> http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-0.6:
>
> changeset:   12553:c47472405465
> branch:      stable-0.6
> user:        Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> date:        Mon Sep 22 23:47:39 2008 +0200
> summary:     High: stonithd: fix handling of timeouts
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dejan
>
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> >
> >
> > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Hideo-san,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 04:35:43PM +0900, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I confirmed even 2.1.4 versions about this problem.
> > > > However, the problem was not solved in the new version either.
> > > >
> > > > We want to solve this problem early by all means for the future.
> > > >
> > > > I made the patch which used a setpgid function for.
> > > >
> > > > This patch works without a problem on a simple test.
> > > >
> > > > How about this patch?
> > > > Besides, is there a good method?
> > > >
> > > > - However, as for this patch, as for the step-by-step stops
> from SIGTERM to SIGKILL, there may
> > > be a
> > > > problem because I do not consider it.
> > >
> > > I see the point of using setpgid(2). Thanks for the patch. I'll
> > > give it a more thorough review next week along with the patch I
> > > already have for this problem.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Dejan
> > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-HA mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-HA mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to