Hi Dejan, it was a long time ago already and I can't find the logs and configuration files of my colleague (no more here) any more , but I think it was something on the MB of server (IPMI ?). Sorry - can't say exactly ;-(
Regards Nikita Michalko Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2008 13:53 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic: > Hi, > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:58:54AM +0100, Nikita Michalko wrote: > > Hi Teh, > > > > we had some similar error: > > all FS on the system HD were set to read-only due to SCSI error, HA was > > still alive, but no action possible - no logs etc. due to read-only ... > > Only possibility was to turn the server off and on. > > In this situation is also Stonith unusable ;-) > > Hmm, what kind of stonith device do you have? Unless it's a > stonith device which depends on the operating system and the > other node is fine, it should work. > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > Best regards > > > > Nikita Michalko > > > > Am Montag, 13. Oktober 2008 04:31 schrieb Teh Tze Siong: > > > I have been playing with HA+DRBD on 2 servers and each with one hard > > > disk installed. The server is hosting the database for other > > > application servers. > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently the application has failed and problem lies in the database > > > server, the primary node. I've checked the server, network still up, I > > > still can read the files and access to database but I cannot update > > > anything and not even allowed to run a "shutdown -h now" or turn off > > > the network interface - The file system has become read-only mode and > > > heartbeat is still alive. I have no choice but to request the > > > datacenter guy to unplug the network cables at the primary node, wait > > > until I confirmed secondary node has taken over, then only power down > > > the primary node. > > > > > > > > > > > > HA+DRBD works well for network failure or power failure on primary node > > > but when it comes to this "half-dead" situation, it is driving me > > > crazy. > > > > > > > > > > > > As the server is installed in remote datacenter, is there a better way > > > for me to counter act this "half-dead" situation? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Zev > > > > > > > > > > > > Disclaimer > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >---- ------------------------- This e-mail and any files transmitted > > > with it are intended only for the use of the addressee. If it contains > > > confidential information, the addressee is expressly prohibited from > > > distributing the e-mail and legal action may be taken against you. > > > Access by any other persons to this e-mail is unauthorized. If you are > > > not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or > > > distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. This e-mail and any > > > files and/or attachments, shall not constitute binding legal obligation > > > with the company. The company shall also not be responsible for any > > > computer virus transmitted with this e-mail. > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >---- ------------------------- MCSB Systems (M) Berhad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-HA mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
