If you read the "configuration explained" documentation, you'll notice that <attributes> tags are no longer used. I think this is even mentioned in the section "what changed in 1.0"
A lot of other things changed too - I'd encourage you to read the pdf and look at the updated examples. On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 15:16, bart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anybody help me with this one? > > Cheers, > > Bart > > ----- "bart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > >> > >> > Just upgraded to Heartbeat 2.99.2-3.1 and Pacemaker 1.0.0-4.1 >> > >> running on CentOS 5.2. >> > >> > >> > >> > I haven't got any resources defined yet, so my cib only >> contains >> > the >> > >> node entries. >> > >> >> > >> and the attribute with says how to validate it (validate-with) >> > > >> > > Yes.. pacemaker-1.0 >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > I am trying to import this resource: >> > >> >> > >> You'd have been better off doing a rolling upgrade which would >> > have >> > >> handled the syntax changes automatically >> > > >> > > That fails: >> > > >> > > The cluster will NOT be able to use this configuration. >> > > Please update the configuration manually to conform to the >> > pacemaker-1.0 syntax. >> > > Errors found during check: config not valid >> > >> > Can you send it to me pls? >> > There may be a bug in the upgrade script. >> >> Yes, it's attached. Hope it comes through.. >> >> But again, I prefer to build the config all over again and find out >> why the snipped doesn't work. >> >> >> > >> > > >> > > But that's no problem. My previous config wasn't any good and I >> > prefer building it from scratch >> > > >> > >> >> > >> > <resources> >> > >> > <primitive class="ocf" id="privip" provider="heartbeat" >> > >> type="IPaddr"> >> > >> > <operations> >> > >> > <op id="op_1" interval="5s" name="monitor" timeout="5s"/> >> > >> > </operations> >> > >> > <instance_attributes id="ia_privip"> >> > >> > <attributes> >> > >> > <nvpair id="nv_privip" name="ip" value="192.168.0.6"/> >> > >> > </attributes> >> > >> > </instance_attributes> >> > >> > </primitive> >> > >> > </resources> >> > >> > >> > >> > which validates fine with my XML-editor. >> > >> >> > >> Is the editor doing schema validation against pacemaker.rng? >> > > >> > > Nope< I was validation against crm.dtd. Got any pointers on howto >> > vailidate agains pacemaker.rng? I am currently using XML Copy Editor >> > 1.1.0.6 to validate >> > >> > Not sure. But google claims that it supports relax-ng schemas >> (which >> > is what the .rng file is) so it should just work >> >> Never knew google is able to validate xml's ;) > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
