Hi,

On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:53:43PM +0100, Arndt Roth wrote:
> Hi *,
> 
>  
> 
> we have configured IPaddr(esses) as resources in a three node HA2
> cluster. While testing the failover I can see that the virtual
> interfaces numbers are incremented every time: from the2:0 to eth2:1 to
> eth2:2 and so on.
> 
>  
> 
> I shut the interface down by "ifconfig eth2:4 down" and heartbeat brings
> it up again immediately as eth2:5.
> 
>  
> 
> Here is the log:
> 
>  
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:23 server2crmd: [29033]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM
> operation IPaddr_10_231_8_221_monitor_3000 (call=147, rc=7) complete
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:24 server2crmd: [29033]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing
> op=IPaddr_10_231_8_221_stop_0
> key=6:90256:0:fc279b6a-f154-44d6-bd85-3a8cb5053323)
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:24 server2lrmd: [29030]: info: rsc:IPaddr_10_231_8_221:
> stop
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:24 server2crmd: [29033]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM
> operation IPaddr_10_231_8_221_monitor_3000 (call=147, rc=-2) Cancelled
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:24 server2lrmd: [29030]: info: RA output:
> (IPaddr_10_231_8_221:stop:stdout) In IP Stop
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:24 server2crmd: [29033]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM
> operation IPaddr_10_231_8_221_stop_0 (call=148, rc=0) complete
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:25 server2crmd: [29033]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing
> op=IPaddr_10_231_8_221_start_0
> key=44:90256:0:fc279b6a-f154-44d6-bd85-3a8cb5053323)
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:25 server2lrmd: [29030]: info: rsc:IPaddr_10_231_8_221:
> start
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:25 server2IPaddr[10674]: INFO: Using calculated netmask for
> 10.231.8.221: 255.255.255.0
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:25 server2IPaddr[10674]: INFO: eval ifconfig eth2:5
> 10.231.8.221 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.231.8.255
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:25 server2crmd: [29033]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM
> operation IPaddr_10_231_8_221_start_0 (call=149, rc=0) complete
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:25 server2crmd: [29033]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing
> op=IPaddr_10_231_8_221_monitor_3000
> key=5:90256:0:fc279b6a-f154-44d6-bd85-3a8cb5053323)
> 
> Jan  5 15:43:26 server2crmd: [29033]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM
> operation IPaddr_10_231_8_221_monitor_3000 (call=150, rc=0) complete
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Here is the configuration.
> 
>  
> 
>    <primitive id="IPaddr_10_231_8_221" class="ocf" type="IPaddr"
> provider="heartbeat" >
> 
>  
> 
>      <operations>
> 
>            <op id="IPaddr_10_231_8_221_monitor" name="monitor"
> interval="3s" timeout="2s" disabled="false"/>
> 
>      </operations>
> 
>  
> 
>      <instance_attributes id="IPaddr_10_231_8_221_inst_attr">
> 
>        <attributes>
> 
>          <nvpair id="IPaddr_10_231_8_221_attr_0" name="ip"
> value="10.231.8.221"/>
> 
>          <nvpair id="IPaddr_10_231_8_221_attr_1" name="nic"
> value="eth2"/>
> 
>          <nvpair id="IPaddr_10_231_8_221_attr_2" name="netmask"
> value="24"/>
> 
>        </attributes>
> 
>      </instance_attributes>
> 
>  
> 
>    </primitive>
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Is there a better way to test this without provoking the increment?
> 
>  
> 
> How do I reset the virtual interfaces number now and what actually
> causes it?

That's the way IPaddr work. AFAIK, can't be prevented.

Thanks,

Dejan

>  
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks for any advice,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  Arndt
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-HA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to