On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 16:35, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > 3. New "prefer" statement/clause for location preference
>> >
>> > old:
>> >        location ms-drbd0-master-on-xen-1 ms-drbd0 rule role=master 100: 
>> > #uname eq xen-1
>> > new:
>> >        prefer ms-drbd0:Master xen-1   # score 100 is implied
>>
>> i really wouldn't like to see a score being inferred, but otherwise i
>> like the new syntax
>
> Score of 100 is what is typically used.

But for no good reason.
Its just the number I pulled out the air when I wrote some of the
initial examples.

Its no better, nor more likely to be correct, than any other value.

> It is also good to have a
> "standard" value, IMO. Anyway, if one wants to use another value,
> the location command is of course still available.

But then the user misses out on the rest of the improvements.

Bottom line, the user should _always_ specify a score for these sort
of constraints/preferences.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to