Hi, On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:39:34PM +0100, Arndt Roth wrote: > Hi *, > > > > I have a group with one OCF and one LSB resource defined into a clone > (OCF-Clone + LSB-primitive in a group didn't work). > > > > Clone Set: clone_ldirectord > > Resource Group: group_clone_ldirectord_lvs-monitor:0 > > resource_ldirectord:0 (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord): Started > server2 > > lvs-monitor:0 (lsb:lvs-monitor): Started server2 > > Resource Group: group_clone_ldirectord_lvs-monitor:1 > > resource_ldirectord:1 (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord): Started > server1 > > lvs-monitor:1 (lsb:lvs-monitor): Started server1 > > Resource Group: group_clone_ldirectord_lvs-monitor:2 > > resource_ldirectord:2 (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord): Started > server3 > > lvs-monitor:2 (lsb:lvs-monitor): Started server3 > > > > Now I get this confusing error-message on all 3 nodes when verifying > with crm_verify: > > > > [r...@server2:~]$ crm_verify -LV > > crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op: > resource_ldirectord:0_monitor_0 found active resource_ldirectord:0 on > server2 > > crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op: > resource_ldirectord:1_monitor_0 found active resource_ldirectord:1 on > server2 > > crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op: > resource_ldirectord:2_monitor_0 found active resource_ldirectord:2 on > server2 > > crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op: > lvs-monitor:2_monitor_0 found active lvs-monitor:2 on server2 > > crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op: > lvs-monitor:0_monitor_0 found active lvs-monitor:0 on server2 > > crm_verify[20534]: 2009/01/09_12:28:27 WARN: unpack_rsc_op: > lvs-monitor:1_monitor_0 found active lvs-monitor:1 on server2 > > > > Why does crm_verify display on all nodes that all resources are active > on server2? > > Apart from the error-message everything looks ok, but how can I confirm > that it is only a crm_verify problem or bug?
Perhaps you can show the configuration too. Maybe this is due to globally-unique set to true (the default) for the clone? Thanks, Dejan > > > Thanks for advice, > > > > Arndt > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
