On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 17:13, Karl W. Lewis <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 12:27:51PM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> I also had trouble with the OCF script on RHEL5 that's why I went > for > >> > >> the lsb script. But again, the OCF is recommended as it has more > >> > >> functionality and lets you monitor the resource better. > >> > > > >> > > Looks like an apache OCF guide is due. Or is it that we just hear > from > >> > > people having trouble with it. > >> > > >> > hmm.. for me the apache OCF agent is working without any problem > (Debian > >> > 4.0, heartbeat/pacemaker) > >> > >> Well, and it should work without problems. But it looks like > >> people are having issues configuring. I suspect that, once the > >> user/admin overcomes the obstacle of setting up the configfile > >> attribute correctly, it boils down to having no server status > >> page or that access to it is denied or something. Well, looking > >> at the meta-data, there's certainly room for improvement in the > >> documentation part. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Dejan > >> > >> > - Thomas > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Linux-HA mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > >> > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Linux-HA mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > >> > > > >>> looking at the meta-data, there's certainly room for improvement in the > > documentation part. << > > > > At the considerable risk of seeming ungrateful for the tremendous piece > of > > work that heartbeat is, yes, I should think there's room for improvement > in > > the documentation. > > its getting better - have you seen the documentation here: > http://clusterlabs.org/mw/Documentation > > particularly the configuration explained document > > > > > Thank you Tobias, Dejan, and Thomas for your time and comments. > > > > My plan then is to attempt an upgrade to the latest version of Heartbeat. > > (I'm skeptical that the OpenSuSE version > > by that do you mean packages built for opensuse or the RHEL packages > hosted on the buildservice? > the later should work without question > > > will install on RedHat, but I'll > > give it a shot.) (I suppose there's no reason not to compile from > source, > > either.) > > or rpmrebuild > > > > > I'll see if I can get our Web expert to arrange a way for our server to > > serve up a status page in a way that he does not feel violates security > > requirements. (I wonder if it can be made available only from localhost, > or > > some such.) > > > > I'm told that if I use the lsb script for apache I can perhaps get mon to > > work with heartbeat to ensure that hte resource stays available. > > > > Again, I thank you all for your suggestions, insights and comments. You > are > > very kind. > > > > Be well, > > > > Karl > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-HA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > Thank you, Andrew. I was unaware of the site you pointed to: http://clusterlabs.org/mw/Documentation I have just loaded that page, and will read it shortly. I was unaware before I visited the Open SuSE site that it hosted rpms for, seemingly, *every* kind of Linux. (I am a bottomless bit of ignorance, as it turns out.) I've just finished putting this newer version of heartbeat on my would-be cluster and I will start again, testing. Karl _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
