On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:44, David Lee <[email protected]> wrote: >
>>> I've no idea whether there is any compatibility overlap between pacemaker >>> and OHAC. I suspect, sadly, that there might not be (i.e. that the >>> clustering world has split into two (or more) parts). >> >> Exactly what kind of split are you referring to here? >> I do hope you're not suggesting an all-or-nothing-one-size-fits-all >> cluster stack, like Heartbeat (or RedHat's cluster2) tried to be, is a >> good thing. > > No. I had wondering/speculating about compatibility/overlap etc. between > (for instance) > (1) pacemaker/heartbeat/OpenAIS etc. (a natural fit for Linux) > (2) Solaris/OHAC etc. (a (presumably) natural fit for Solaris) > (3) Other such 'families'. > > And perhaps pooling/sharing of scarce development resources (person-time) > across those. Thats exactly the sort of (positive) thinking that drove the decision to support openais 0 to merge the RedHat and SUSE clustering communities. Some people tried to sabotage that process, but we got there in the end :-) Or put another way, "yes, we welcome working with others" _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
